{ "feature_id": "F-143", "agent": "security", "stage": "security_gate", "verdict": "APPROVED", "summary": "F-143 introduces NO database read path and NO migration, so there is no SQL injection surface in the new code: validation/reporting routes hold no `pool`, no raw SQL, no template literals concatenating user input. Input validation is explicit via parseJson(reportingFiltersSchema, request.query ?? {}) — querystring values flow only through zod.safeParse (UUID format, ISO-datetime parse, enum membership, integer/page-size bounds), and zod issues map to AppError(400,VALIDATION_ERROR) via the shared error path (no internal detail leakage). RBAC is enforced server-side in every handler before any response: requireReportingPermission(user, perm) throws AppError(403,FORBIDDEN) for any role lacking the permission — customers never reach the 200 path on either route (verified customer->403). The REPORTING_ROLE_PERMISSIONS map is a code constant (no secrets/credentials), keyed only by Role. No new user-facing query parameter alters an existing SQL query; the pre-existing R1 deep-import in security/routes.ts (log-broadcaster, introduced by F-154) is untouched and out of F-143 scope.", "checks": [ { "item": "no SQL / no DB read path introduced", "ok": true, "evidence": "ReportingRoutesDeps has only `authenticate`; no `pool`, no .query(), no raw SQL anywhere in reporting/" }, { "item": "input validation explicit via parseJson + zod (no magic)", "ok": true, "evidence": "parseJson(reportingFiltersSchema, request.query ?? {}); zod UUID/ISO-datetime/enum/int bounds; filters.test invalid-uuid + inverted-range cases" }, { "item": "no user input concatenated into SQL", "ok": true, "evidence": "no SQL at all in module; validation failures -> AppError(400) via parseJson" }, { "item": "no secret/credential material added", "ok": true, "evidence": "REPORTING_ROLE_PERMISSIONS is a role->string[] map; no tokens/keys" }, { "item": "RBAC enforced server-side (customer -> 403)", "ok": true, "evidence": "requireReportingPermission called before reply.send on both routes; routes.test customer-403 on /schema and /validate" }, { "item": "no error-detail leakage to client", "ok": true, "evidence": "AppError carries code + message only; build-app errorHandler strips details to server-side logs for 5xx; validation details come from zod issue messages (paths/messages), not stacks" }, { "item": "pre-existing security.routes.ts R1 not introduced by F-143", "ok": true, "evidence": "git diff shows reporting/ + build-app.ts only; security/routes.ts untouched" } ], "issues": [] }